Close Menu
    What's Hot

    ChatGPT Forecasts Bitcoin’s H1 2025 Price

    June 21, 2025

    Ethereum, Dogecoin, XRP Prices Plummet: Here’s the Cause

    June 21, 2025

    1inch Partners with Sonic Network to Boost DeFi Trading

    June 21, 2025
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Finances Zippy
    Subscribe
    • Home
    • Business
      1. Markets
      2. Insights
      3. View All

      ChatGPT Forecasts Bitcoin’s H1 2025 Price

      June 21, 2025

      Ethereum, Dogecoin, XRP Prices Plummet: Here’s the Cause

      June 21, 2025

      1inch Partners with Sonic Network to Boost DeFi Trading

      June 21, 2025

      Bitcoin Dips to Range Lows: Will Liquidity Spark Reversal?

      June 21, 2025

      ChatGPT Forecasts Bitcoin’s H1 2025 Price

      June 21, 2025

      Ethereum, Dogecoin, XRP Prices Plummet: Here’s the Cause

      June 21, 2025

      1inch Partners with Sonic Network to Boost DeFi Trading

      June 21, 2025

      Bitcoin Dips to Range Lows: Will Liquidity Spark Reversal?

      June 21, 2025
    • Crypto
      • Bitcoin
      • Ethereum
    • More
      • About Us
      • Disclaimer
      • Contact
    Finances Zippy
    Home»Crypto»Unexpected Turn in Ripple Vs. SEC Battle: Amicus Filing Shakes Up Case
    Unexpected Turn in Ripple Vs SEC Battle Amicus Filing Shakes.42 A wide format image featuring the official Ripple XRP logo which consists
    Crypto

    Unexpected Turn in Ripple Vs. SEC Battle: Amicus Filing Shakes Up Case

    financeBy financeJanuary 23, 2025No Comments4 Mins Read
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

    The unfolding legal drama between fintech company Ripple Labs, Inc. and the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) recently saw a new development as Better Markets, Inc. entered the fray. Known for their advocacy towards public interest in the financial markets, Better Markets, Inc., a reputable nonprofit organization, lodged an amicus curiae brief on January 22. The submission was made to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit to sturdily back the SEC’s appeal against a previous district court verdict. The contentious issue at hand? The definition of “investment contract” and whether it applies to Ripple’s XRP.

    In their brief, Better Markets took umbrage with the district court’s interpretation of the Howey test, a commonly used measure for determining the status of a transaction as an investment contract and, therefore, a security. According to the nonprofit, the lower court’s decision erroneously exempted XRP tokens traded in secondary markets from being classified as securities. Their interpretation primarily dwelt on direct purchases from the issuer as the primary criterion for classification.

    Challenging the Ripple and XRP Status Quo

    Better Markets’ brief contested the district court’s restrictive interpretation of ‘investment contract,’ claiming that it shields a sizeable portion of crypto offerings and many other potential investments from the purview of securities laws. They argued that such a narrow interpretation runs counter to well-established legal principles designed to adapt to emerging financial trends and safeguard investors from new risks.

    The brief highlighted a significant discrepancy, noting, “The court’s decision about these secondary or ‘Programmatic’ transactions’ status under Howey was incorrect.” In Better Markets’ view, how an investor acquires an investment does not alter the underlying expectation of profits contingent on the efforts of others – a foundation of the Howey test.

    The Promotion and Perception of Ripple’s Token Sales

    Better Markets also took issue with the district court’s understanding of the economic aspects surrounding Ripple’s token sales, especially Ripple’s influence on investor expectations through its marketing and promotion. They pointed out Ripple’s extensive use of various channels for its sales campaign, including primers, brochures, market reports, public interviews, press conferences, and social media platforms.

    Furthermore, Better Markets criticized the district court’s perception of retail investors’ financial acumen. They argued that the court overlooked the reality of modern-day economic situations where many retail investors learn about new investment offerings and trends through social media platforms frequently utilized by promoters to gather investor funds.

    The potential implications for investor protection if the district court’s ruling is upheld were highlighted in the brief. Foreseeing possibilities for widespread exploitation in the cryptocurrency securities market, Better Markets warned that this would disproportionately impact less sophisticated retail investors. They argue that the SEC would be rendered incapable of protecting these investor classes from the manifold challenges in the crypto securities markets without jurisdiction over such securities.

    Despite the strong-worded brief, it remains uncertain if it will have any meaningful impact on the case. Recent changes in SEC’s leadership under acting Chair Mark Uyeda have led to speculation about a potential resolution to the ongoing lawsuit against Ripple. Markedly, the SEC has announced a closed-door meeting under Uyeda’s stewardship, adding fuel to the speculations about the future course of Ripple’s ongoing legal battle. As of press time, XRP was trading at $3.14.

    FAQ

    Who is Better Markets?

    Better Markets is a nonprofit organization dedicated to promoting public interest in financial markets. They recently filed an amicus curiae brief in support of the SEC’s appeal against a previous district court decision regarding Ripple Labs.

    What is the significance of the Howey test?

    The Howey test is traditionally used to determine whether a transaction qualifies as an investment contract, and subsequently, a security. The outcome of this test has substantial implications for how financial assets like XRP are classified and regulated.

    What is the potential impact of the lawsuit against Ripple Labs?

    The lawsuit could have significant implications for the classification and regulation of cryptocurrencies like XRP. If Ripple Labs is unsuccessful, it could potentially limit the trading and use of XRP in the future.

    How could the SEC’s recent leadership change affect the lawsuit against Ripple Labs?

    The recent appointment of Mark Uyeda as the acting Chair of the SEC has sparked speculation about a potential resolution to the SEC’s lawsuit against Ripple. However, it is still unclear what direction this might take.

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    finance
    • Website

    Related Posts

    ChatGPT Forecasts Bitcoin’s H1 2025 Price

    June 21, 2025

    Ethereum, Dogecoin, XRP Prices Plummet: Here’s the Cause

    June 21, 2025

    1inch Partners with Sonic Network to Boost DeFi Trading

    June 21, 2025

    Bitcoin Dips to Range Lows: Will Liquidity Spark Reversal?

    June 21, 2025
    Add A Comment
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Top Posts

    The Bit Journal– Your Trusted Source for Crypto, Finance, and Technology News

    Sponsor: TBJ PostMarch 14, 2025

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the latest sports news from SportsSite about soccer, football and tennis.

    Your hub for trusted crypto news. Get clear insights, trends, and updates from the world of digital finance. Head to our homepage for more content.

    Stay connected. Follow us online:

    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest YouTube
    Top Insights

    ChatGPT Forecasts Bitcoin’s H1 2025 Price

    June 21, 2025

    Ethereum, Dogecoin, XRP Prices Plummet: Here’s the Cause

    June 21, 2025

    1inch Partners with Sonic Network to Boost DeFi Trading

    June 21, 2025
    Get Informed

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

    Disclaimer:


    All information provided on this website is for general informational purposes only and should not be interpreted as investment advice. Nothing presented here constitutes an explicit or implicit recommendation regarding any financial product, investment vehicle, or strategy. The content does not take into account your personal objectives, financial circumstances, or specific needs; therefore, you should conduct your own research or seek guidance from a qualified advisor before making any financial decisions. Investing inherently carries risks, including the potential loss of part or all of your capital. This website and its content are not intended for use in jurisdictions where such investment activities are restricted or prohibited and should only be accessed in compliance with applicable laws. Additionally, investor protection regulations in your country or region may not apply to activities conducted through this site. While the use of this website is free of charge, we may have partnerships with certain companies featured on the site and may earn commissions through referral links.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.