In the ever-evolving landscape of cryptocurrency regulation, Ripple finds itself at a pivotal juncture. Following Judge Analisa Torres’ significant ruling in its protracted legal battle with the SEC, Ripple now faces a crucial decision: whether to abandon the appeal or press on in pursuit of relief from the judgment. This unfolding drama not only impacts Ripple but also serves as a litmus test for the broader crypto industry’s regulatory framework.

Ripple’s Legal Hurdles: Navigating Through the SEC Lawsuit

Ripple’s Recent Setback in Court

An important court document reveals that Judge Torres has dismissed the joint plea from Ripple and the SEC for an indicative ruling. This ruling could have exonerated Ripple if granted, by vacating an existing injunction and reducing a financial penalty from $125 million to $50 million. Judge Torres determined that neither party provided sufficient exceptional circumstances to justify prioritizing their requests over the public interest and the proper administration of justice. She further clarified that even if jurisdiction was returned to her court, she would still refuse the request to vacate the injunction or decrease the civil penalty.

Moreover, the court emphasized that nothing substantial had changed about Ripple’s violations since the original judgment. Despite some claims to the contrary, Judge Torres noted the SEC’s insistence that Ripple would likely continue breaching securities laws without such an injunction. This view was part of the rationale for maintaining the civil penalty as a broader deterrent to Ripple and similar entities. The argument that other enforcement actions had been dropped was also dismissed, as those cases were deemed to differ fundamentally from Ripple’s.

The Future Trajectory of the XRP Lawsuit

Judge Torres indicated that both Ripple and the SEC have the option to withdraw their appeals if they genuinely wish to conclude the lawsuit. Alternatively, Ripple might pursue its appeal if it seeks relief from the judgment. The judge also highlighted that Ripple and the SEC lack the power to mutually agree not to be bound by a final decision, which can only be overturned by a higher court through an appeal process.

Legal analyst Fred Rispoli suggests that both parties might eventually drop their appeals, potentially settling for a $50 million penalty, with the injunction still standing. Ripple’s Chief Legal Officer, Stuart Alderoty, acknowledged that the decision now rests with them. He confirmed that Ripple could either abandon the appeal or challenge her judgment regarding historical institutional sales. Regardless, Alderoty emphasized that the legal classification of XRP as not being a security remains unaffected.

Is XRP’s Legal Status Still Secure?

While the recent ruling may appear as a setback, Ripple’s Chief Legal Officer has reiterated that XRP’s current legal status as a non-security is unchanged. This means that while Ripple may face penalties, XRP itself is not classified as a security, keeping its regulatory standing clear.

Can Ripple Appeal the Judge’s Ruling?

Yes, Ripple has the option to appeal Judge Torres’ ruling if it seeks to amend the final judgment. However, such a move requires thorough consideration of legal strategies and implications, as only a higher court can revise the current judgment.

What Are the Implications of Dropping the Appeal for Ripple?

If Ripple chooses to drop the appeal, it would likely expedite the conclusion of the lawsuit, potentially settling with a reduced financial penalty. This could provide more certainty and stability for Ripple and its stakeholders, enabling them to focus more on business operations rather than ongoing litigation.